Wisconsin § 879.27 - Appeals.

§ 879.27. Appeals.

879.27(1) (1) Appeal is to the court of appeals. Any person aggrieved by any appealable order or judgment of the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction may appeal or take a writ of error therefrom to the court of appeals. 879.27(2) (2) Effect of chs. 801 to 847. In all matters not otherwise provided for in this chapter relating to appeals from courts assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction to the court of appeals, the law and rules of practice of chs. 801 to 847 govern. 879.27(4) (4) Who may appeal on behalf of minor or individual adjudicated incompetent. In all cases the appeal on behalf of any minor or individual adjudicated incompetent may be taken and prosecuted by the guardian of the minor’s or individual’s estate or by a guardian ad litem. 879.27(5) (5) Limitation on bond and costs. On appeals from courts assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction to the court of appeals no bond may be required of, or costs awarded against, any alleged incompetent individual or person acting in behalf of an alleged incompetent individual on an appeal from an adjudication of incompetency, and no bond may be required of any personal representative, guardian, or trustee of a testamentary trust. 879.27 History History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 783 (1975); 1977 c. 187 , 449 ; 1979 c. 89 ; 1983 a. 219 ; 1993 a. 486 ; 2005 a. 387 . 879.27 Note Judicial Council Note, 1983: Sub. (3) providing an appeal deadline of 60 days from entry of order or judgment in probate proceedings, has been repealed for greater uniformity. An appeal must be initiated within the time period specified in s. 808.04 (1). [Bill 151-S] 879.27 Annotation A memorandum decision in a probate proceeding was treated as an order terminating the proceeding and therefore appealable although no separate order was entered when it appeared that the memorandum decision was clearly intended to be a final ruling. Boerner v. Boerner, 46 Wis. 2d 183 , 174 N.W.2d 457 (1970). 879.27 Annotation The agents of an incompetent named in the incompetent’s health care and durable power of attorney documents had standing to appeal under sub. (1). Because they were agents under these two documents, they were substitutes for the incompetent for purposes of sub. (1). Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27 , 251 Wis. 2d 10 , 640 N.W.2d 773 , 00-0929 . 879.27 Annotation Final orders and final judgments in probate cases should state that they are final for the purposes of an appeal, if that is the intention of the parties involved and of the circuit court. Sanders v. Estate of Sanders, 2008 WI 63 , 310 Wis. 2d 175 , 750 N.W.2d 806 , 06-0424 .