(2)(a) The department's final decision to approve or reject a proposed master program or master program amendment by a local government planning under RCW
36.70A.040 shall be appealed to the growth management hearings board by filing a petition as provided in RCW
36.70A.290.
(b) If the appeal to the growth management hearings board concerns shorelines, the growth management hearings board shall review the proposed master program or amendment solely for compliance with the requirements of this chapter, the policy of RCW
90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines, the internal consistency provisions of RCW
36.70A.070,
36.70A.040(4),
35.63.125, and
35A.63.105, and chapter
43.21C RCW as it relates to the adoption of master programs and amendments under chapter
90.58 RCW.
(c) If the appeal to the growth management hearings board concerns a shoreline of statewide significance, the board shall uphold the decision by the department unless the board, by clear and convincing evidence, determines that the decision of the department is noncompliant with the policy of RCW
90.58.020 or the applicable guidelines, or chapter
43.21C RCW as it relates to the adoption of master programs and amendments under this chapter.
(d) The appellant has the burden of proof in all appeals to the growth management hearings board under this subsection.
(e) Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the growth management hearings board under this subsection may appeal the decision to superior court as provided in RCW
36.70A.300.
(3)(a) The department's final decision to approve or reject a proposed master program or master program amendment by a local government not planning under RCW
36.70A.040 shall be appealed to the shorelines hearings board by filing a petition within thirty days of the date that the department publishes notice of its final decision under RCW
90.58.090(8).
(b) In an appeal relating to shorelines, the shorelines hearings board shall review the proposed master program or master program amendment and, after full consideration of the presentations of the parties, shall determine the validity of the local government's master program or amendment in light of the policy of RCW
90.58.020 and the applicable guidelines, and chapter
43.21C RCW as it relates to the adoption of master programs and amendments under this chapter.
(c) In an appeal relating to shorelines of statewide significance, the shorelines hearings board shall uphold the decision by the department unless the board determines, by clear and convincing evidence that the decision of the department is noncompliant with the policy of RCW
90.58.020 or the applicable guidelines, or chapter
43.21C RCW as it relates to the adoption of master programs and amendments under this chapter.
(d) Review by the shorelines hearings board shall be considered an adjudicative proceeding under chapter
34.05 RCW, the administrative procedure act. The appellant shall have the burden of proof in all such reviews.
(e) Whenever possible, the review by the shorelines hearings board shall be heard within the county where the land subject to the proposed master program or master program amendment is primarily located. The department and any party aggrieved by a final decision of the hearings board may appeal the decision to superior court as provided in chapter
34.05 RCW.
(4) A master program amendment shall become effective after the approval of the department or after the decision of the growth management hearings board or shorelines hearings board to uphold the master program or master program amendment, provided that either the growth management hearings board or the shorelines hearings board may remand the master program or master program amendment to the local government or the department for modification prior to the final adoption of the master program or master program amendment.
