Vermont § 4098 - Limitations on establishing or relocating dealers

§ 4098. Limitations on establishing or relocating dealers

• (a) In the event that a manufacturer seeks to enter into a franchise establishing an additional
  new motor vehicle dealer or relocating an existing new motor vehicle dealer within
  or into a relevant market area where the same line-make is then represented, the manufacturer
  shall in writing first give notice to the Transportation Board and notify each new
  motor vehicle dealer in such line-make in the relevant market area of the intention
  to establish an additional dealer or to relocate an existing dealer within or into
  that market area. Within 20 days of receiving such notice or within 20 days after
  the end of any appeal procedure provided by the manufacturer, any such new motor vehicle
  dealer may file a protest with the Board opposing the establishing or relocating of
  the new motor vehicle dealer. A copy of the protest shall be served on the manufacturer
  within the 20-day period. When such a protest is filed, the manufacturer shall not
  establish or relocate the proposed new motor vehicle dealer until the Board has held
  a hearing, nor thereafter, if the Board has determined that there is not good cause
  for permitting the addition or relocation of such new motor vehicle dealer. (b) This section does not apply: (1) to the relocation of an existing dealer within that dealer’s relevant market area,
  provided that the relocation not be at a site within six miles of a licensed new motor
  vehicle dealer for the same line-make of motor vehicle; or (2) if the proposed new motor vehicle dealer is to be established at or within two miles
  of a location at which a former licensed new motor vehicle dealer for the same line-make
  of new motor vehicle had ceased operating within the previous two years. (c) In determining whether good cause has been established for entering into or relocating
  an additional new motor vehicle dealer for the same line-make, the Board shall take
  into consideration the existing circumstances, including: (1) permanency of the investment of both the existing and proposed new motor vehicle dealers; (2) growth or decline in population and new car registrations in the relevant market area; (3) effect on the consuming public in the relevant market area; (4) whether it is injurious or beneficial to the public welfare for an additional new
  motor vehicle dealer to be established; (5) whether the new motor vehicle dealers of the same line-make in that relevant market
  area are providing adequate competition and convenient customer care for the motor
  vehicles of the line-make in the market area, which shall include the adequacy of
  motor vehicle sales and service facilities, equipment, supply of motor vehicle parts,
  and qualified service personnel; (6) whether the establishment of an additional new motor vehicle dealer would increase
  competition, and therefore be in the public interest; and (7) the effect that the proposed franchise would have on the stability of existing franchisees
  in the same line-make in the relevant market area. (d) At any hearing conducted by the Board under this section, the manufacturer seeking
  to establish an additional new motor vehicle dealership or relocate an existing new
  motor vehicle dealership shall have the burden of proof in establishing that good
  cause exists. (Added 1981, No. 157 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. April 14, 1982; amended 2009, No. 57, § 1, eff. June 1, 2009.)