Full text of Utah Utah Code § 36-12-15.3 — Response to audit -- Chief officer -- Entity reporting requirements -- Audit response plan -- Semi-annual update., with citation guidance and answers to common questions.
§ 36-12-15.3. Response to audit -- Chief officer -- Entity reporting requirements -- Audit response plan -- Semi-annual update.
Effective 5/7/2025 36-12-15.3.
Response to audit -- Chief officer -- Entity reporting requirements -- Audit response plan -- Semi-annual update.
(1)
As used in this section:
(a)
"Alternative action" means a process, practice, or procedure that an entity implements in response to an audit report that is different from the process, practice, or procedure described in a recommendation.
(b)
"Audit report" means a written report that the office issues that contains the office's findings and recommendations with respect to an audit of an entity.
(c)
"Audit response plan" means a written document that an entity issues that contains the entity's response to an audit report of the entity.
(d)
"Audit Subcommittee" means the subcommittee created in Subsection 36-12-8(1)(c).
(e)
"Chief officer" means the individual responsible for the day-to-day direction, management, and operation of an entity.
(f)
"Entity" means:
(i)
the same as that term is defined in Subsection 36-12-15(1); or
(ii)
any other person that the office is authorized to audit under any other provision of law.
(g)
"Legislative committee" means the committee to which the Audit Subcommittee refers an audit report under Subsection 36-12-8(2)(d)(ii)(C).
(h)
"Office" means the Office of the Legislative Auditor General.
(i)
"Recommendation" means a process, practice, or procedure described in an audit report that the office proposes an entity implement.
(j)
"Reply" means a written document that the office issues that contains the office's response to an entity's audit response plan.
(2)
(a)
In addition to any other information that the office is required to include or attach to an audit report, the office shall, for each audit report the office issues:
(i)
subject to Subsection (2)(b), include in the audit report:
(A)
the identity of the chief officer; and
(B)
a notice to the chief officer that the chief officer must comply with the reporting requirements described in this section; and
(ii)
attach to the audit report:
(A)
the audit response plan of the entity that is the subject of the audit report; and
(B)
at the discretion of the legislative auditor general, a reply to the entity's audit response plan.
(b)
To comply with the reporting requirements of this section, the legislative auditor general may:
(i)
identify an individual other than the chief officer; or
(ii)
if the entity is an entity under the direct supervision and control of the governor or the lieutenant governor, identify with the governor or lieutenant governor or their designee, an individual other than the chief officer to comply with the reporting requirements of this section.
(3)
The chief officer of an entity that is the subject of an audit report shall:
(a)
prepare an audit response plan that:
(i)
is in writing;
(ii)
responds to the findings in the audit report; and
(iii)
subject to Subsection (4), for each recommendation in the audit report:
(A)
describes how the entity will implement the recommendation;
(B)
identifies the individual employed by or otherwise affiliated with the entity who is responsible for implementing the recommendation;
(C)
establishes a timetable that identifies benchmarks for the entity to implement the recommendation; and
(D)
specifies an anticipated deadline by which the entity will fully implement the recommendation; and
(b)
sign and submit the audit response plan to the office before the office submits the audit report to the Audit Subcommittee under Subsection 36-12-15(6)(b).
(4)
If the chief officer described in Subsection (3) objects to implementing a recommendation in an audit report, the chief officer shall:
(a)
prepare an audit response plan in accordance with Subsections (3)(a)(i) and (ii) that:
(i)
explains the basis for the objection; and
(ii)
(A)
identifies an alternative action that the entity will implement; or
(B)
specifies that the entity will not implement the recommendation or an alternative action; and
(b)
comply with submission requirements described in Subsection (3)(b).
(5)
A chief officer implementing an alternative action under Subsection (4)(a)(ii)(A) shall, as it relates to the alternative action, include in the audit response plan the information described in Subsection (3)(a)(iii).
(6)
Subject to Subsection (9), if the chief officer of an entity that is the subject of an audit report implements a recommendation under Subsection (3)(a)(iii), or an alternative action under Subsections (4)(a)(ii)(A) and (5), the chief officer shall, no later than 180 days after the day on which the Audit Subcommittee refers the audit report to a legislative committee:
(a)
prepare an update to the entity's audit response plan that:
(i)
is in writing; and
(ii)
describes the entity's progress towards fully implementing:
(A)
each recommendation addressed in the entity's audit response plan under Subsection (3)(a)(iii); or
(B)
each alternative action addressed in the entity's audit response plan under Subsections (4)(a)(ii)(A) and (5); and
(b)
submit the update to the legislative committee and the legislative auditor general.
(7)
Subject to Subsection (9), after the chief officer described in Subsection (6) complies with the submission requirements described in Subsection (6)(b), the chief officer shall:
(a)
continue to update the audit response plan in accordance with Subsection (6)(a); and
(b)
submit the update to the legislative committee and the legislative auditor general at least semi-annually.
(8)
Upon receiving an audit response plan update under Subsection (6) or (7), the legislative auditor general may inform the chief officer of the following:
(a)
(i)
if the legislative auditor general agrees or disagrees with the implementation status of a recommendation; and
(ii)
if the legislative auditor general disagrees with the implementation status, the basis for the disagreement and an opportunity for the chief officer to provide additional information; and
(b)
if the chief officer no longer needs to provide an update on the status of a recommendation.
(9)
A chief officer's obligation to update an audit response plan under this section terminates when the legislative auditor general reports to the Audit Subcommittee that the entity which is the subject of the audit report has fully implemented:
(a)
each recommendation addressed in the entity's audit response plan under Subsection (3)(a)(iii); or
(b)
each alternative action addressed in the entity's audit response plan under Subsections (4)(a)(ii)(A) and (5) only if the alternative action has addressed the recommendation identified in the audit report.
Frequently Asked Questions About Utah § 36-12-15.3
What does Utah Code § 36-12-15.3 cover?
Section 36-12-15.3 ("Response to audit -- Chief officer -- Entity reporting requirements -- Audit response plan -- Semi-annual update.") is part of the Utah Code, the codified statutory law of Utah. It sets out the legal rule or procedure described in the text above. Statutes are amended regularly, so always verify against the official source.
How do I cite Utah § 36-12-15.3?
A common citation format is "Utah Code § 36-12-15.3" (Utah). Legal writing may require the code abbreviation, section number, and year or edition. Match the style required by your court, professor, or publisher.
Is this the official text of Utah law?
No. This page is for research and education and may not include the most recent amendments. For official current law, check the Utah official source linked on this page or consult a licensed Utah attorney.
How does Utah § 36-12-15.3 apply to my situation?
Statutes are interpreted in context, and application depends on your specific facts. Only a licensed attorney in Utah can advise on how this section applies to you. Contact your state or local bar association for a referral.
