Tennessee § 68-1-125 - Funds for in-home visitation programs — Emphasis on evidence-based programs — Report on findings.

§ 68-1-125. Funds for in-home visitation programs — Emphasis on evidence-based programs — Report on findings.

As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: “Evidence-based” means a program or practice that meets the following requirements: The program or practice is governed by a program manual or protocol that specifies the nature, quality, and amount of service that constitutes the program; and Scientific research using methods that meet high scientific standards, evaluated using either randomized controlled research designs, or quasi-experimental research designs with equivalent comparison groups. The effects of such programs must have demonstrated using two (2) or more separate client samples that the program improves client outcomes central to the purpose of the program; “In-home visitation” means a service delivery strategy that is carried out in the homes of families of children from conception to school age that provides culturally sensitive face-to-face visits by nurses, other professionals, or trained and supervised lay workers to promote positive parenting practices, enhance the socioemotional and cognitive development of children, improve the health of the family, and empower families to be self-sufficient. “In-home visitation” does not include any medicaid funded disease management or case management services or programs which may include home visits; “Pilot program” means a temporary research-based or theory-based program or project that is eligible for funding from any source to determine whether or not evidence supports its continuation beyond the fixed evaluation period. A pilot program must provide for and include: Development of a program manual or protocol that specifies the nature, quality, and amount of service that constitutes the program; and Scientific research using methods that meet high scientific standards for evaluating the effects of such programs must demonstrate on at least an annual basis whether or not the program improves client outcomes central to the purpose of the program; “Research-based” means a program or practice that has some research demonstrating effectiveness, but that does not yet meet the standard of evidence-based; and “Theory-based” means a program or practice that has general support among treatment providers and experts, based on experience or professional literature, may have anecdotal or case-study support, and has potential for becoming a research-based program or practice. With the long-term emphasis on procuring services whose methods have been measured, tested, and demonstrated to improve client outcomes, the department of health, and any other state agency that administers funds related to in-home visitation programs shall ensure that fifty percent (50%) of state-appropriated funds expended for in-home visitation services are used for evidence-based models during fiscal year 2012-2013 and that seventy-five percent (75%) of such funds are used for evidence-based programs during fiscal year 2013-2014 and each subsequent fiscal year thereafter. With the goal of identifying and expanding the number and type of available evidence-based programs, the department shall continue the ongoing research and evaluation of sound, theory-based and research-based programs and to that end the department may engage in and fund pilot programs as defined in this section. The department shall include in any contract with a provider of services related to in-home visitation programs a provision requiring that the provider shall set forth a means to measure the outcome of the services. The measures must include, but not be limited to, the number of people served, the type of services provided, and the estimated rate of success of the population served. The department of health, in conjunction with a representative of the Tennessee commission on children and youth, and with ongoing consultation of appropriate experts and representatives of relevant providers who are appointed by the commissioner of health to provide such consultation, shall determine which of its current programs are evidence-based, research-based and theory-based, and shall provide a report of those findings, including an explanation of the support of those findings, to the governor, the health and welfare committee of the senate, the judiciary committee of the house of representatives and the judiciary committee of the senate by no later than January 1 of each year. The department of health shall also provide in its report the measurements of the individual programs, as set forth in subsection (c). Acts 2008, ch. 1029, §§ 1, 2; 2011, ch. 410, § 3(ee); 2012, ch. 873, §§ 1-3; 2013, ch. 236, § 24; 2019, ch. 345, § 130. Compiler's Notes. Acts 2008, ch. 1029, § 3 provided that the commissioner of health is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate the purposes of this act. All rules and regulations shall be promulgated in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5. For the Preamble to the act concerning the prohibition against establishment of a special committee if there is a standing committee on the same subject, please refer to Acts 2011, ch. 410. Acts 2012, ch. 873, § 4 provided that the commissioner of health is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations for the administration of the act, which amended the definitions of “evidence-based” and “in-home visitation” and amended subdivision (b)(1). All such rules and regulations shall be promulgated in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5. Amendments. The 2013 amendment substituted “the health and welfare committee of the senate, the civil justice committee of the house of representatives” for “the general welfare, health and human resources committee of the senate, the children and family affairs committee of the house of representatives” in the first sentence of (d). The 2019 amendment substituted “the judiciary committee of the house of representatives” for “the civil justice committee of the house of representatives” in the first sentence of (d). Effective Dates. Acts 2013, ch. 236, § 94. April 19, 2013. Acts 2019, ch. 345, § 148. May 10, 2019.