Tennessee § 16-22-104 - General principles.

§ 16-22-104. General principles.

All drug court treatment programs in this state shall be established and operate according to the following general principles as established by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, Drug Court Standards Committee: Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing; Drug courts use a nonadversarial approach, with prosecution and defense counsel promoting public safety while protecting participants' due process rights; Drug courts identify eligible participants early and promptly place them in the drug court treatment program; Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, mental health and other related treatment and rehabilitation services; Drug courts monitor abstinence by frequent alcohol and other drug testing; Drug courts use a coordinated strategy to govern responses to participants' compliance; Drug courts use ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant as an essential component of the program; Drug courts utilize monitoring and evaluation to measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness; Drug courts employ continuing interdisciplinary education to promote effective drug court planning, implementation and operations; and Drug courts forge partnerships among the courts, public agencies and community-based organizations to generate local support and enhance drug court effectiveness. Acts 2003, ch. 335, § 1; 2010, ch. 833, § 1. Amendments. The 2010 amendment inserted “, mental health” in (4). Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 833, § 3. April 27, 2010. Attorney General Opinions. The judge, prosecutor and public defender should be personally immune from money damages for allegedly wrongful acts or omissions arising from their participation in cases in drug court, OAG 05-138 (9/8/05). Drug court treatment program participant facing sanctions, but not termination from program, for infractions—notice and hearing rights; recusal of judge. OAG 11-10, 2011 Tenn. AG LEXIS 10 (1/18/11). Cited: State v. Stewart, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 691 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 18, 2010).