Tennessee § 12-9-104 - Interlocal agreements.

§ 12-9-104. Interlocal agreements.

Any power or powers, privileges or authority exercised or capable of exercise by a public agency of this state, including those provided in § 6-54-307 or § 68-221-1107(b), may be exercised and enjoyed jointly with any other public agency of this state having the power or powers, privilege or authority, and jointly with any public agency of any other state or the United States to the extent that laws of such other state or of the United States permit such joint exercise or enjoyment. Any agency of the state government when acting jointly with any public agency may exercise and enjoy all of the powers, privileges and authority conferred by this chapter upon a public agency. The authority for joint or cooperative action of political subdivisions shall apply to powers, privileges or authority vested in, funded by, and/or under the control of their governing bodies and relative to which the governing bodies may make other types of contracts. No joint or cooperative agreement shall be entered into affecting or relating to the constitutional or statutory powers, privileges or authority of officers of political subdivisions, or of agencies of political subdivisions with a separate governing board and having powers granted by statute independent of the governing body. Notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary, any municipality may enter into an agreement with the sheriff, court of general sessions, and the governing body of any county in which it is located to provide for the enforcement of the municipality's ordinances according to §§ 8-8-201(a)(34) and 16-15-501. The agreement between the municipality and the county governing body shall be limited to provide that the cost of such enforcement will be borne by the municipality where the court costs paid over to the county, as provided by § 16-15-501, are not adequate. Agencies of political subdivisions that have governing boards separate from the governing bodies of the political subdivisions may make agreements for joint or cooperative action with other such agencies and with other public agencies. The power to make joint or cooperative agreements includes any power, privilege or authority exercised or that may be exercised by each of the agencies that is a party to the agreement. Agreements between agencies of political subdivisions that have separate governing boards and other such agencies and agreements between such agencies and public agencies shall substantially conform to the requirements of this chapter. The governing bodies of such political subdivisions shall require agreements made by their agencies pursuant to this chapter to be submitted to the governing body for approval before the agreements take effect. Any two (2) or more public agencies may enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to this chapter. Appropriate action of the governing bodies of the participating public agencies by resolution or otherwise pursuant to law shall be necessary before any such agreement may enter into force. Any such agreement shall specify the following: Its duration; The precise organization, composition and nature of any separate legal or administrative entity or entities created thereby, which may include, but is not limited to, a corporation not-for-profit, together with the powers delegated to such a corporation; Its purpose or purposes; The manner of financing the joint or cooperative undertaking and of establishing and maintaining a budget for such undertaking; The permissible method or methods to be employed in accomplishing the partial or complete termination of the agreement and for disposing of property upon such partial or complete termination; and Any other necessary and proper matters. In the event that the agreement does not establish a separate legal entity or entities to conduct the joint or cooperative undertaking, the agreement shall, in addition to the requirements of subdivisions (c)(1)-(6), contain the following: Provision for an administrator or a joint board responsible for administering the joint or cooperative undertaking. In the case of a joint board, public agencies party to the agreement shall be represented; and The manner of acquiring, holding and disposing of real and personal property used in the joint or cooperative undertaking. No agreement made pursuant to this chapter shall relieve any public agency of any obligation or responsibility imposed upon it by law, except that, to the extent of actual and timely performance thereof by a joint board or other legal or administrative entity or entities created by an agreement made hereunder, those performances may be offered in satisfaction of the obligation or responsibility. Notwithstanding the Local Government Public Obligations Act of 1986, compiled in title 9, chapter 21, including § 9-21-105 and § 9-21-107 to the contrary, a separate legal or administrative entity, created by interlocal agreement between two (2) or more political subdivisions of the state acting pursuant to this chapter, is not empowered to: Assess, levy, or collect ad valorem taxes; Issue general obligation bonds; or Exercise the power of eminent domain. However, to the extent that the participating political subdivisions possess such powers, the political subdivisions may exercise such powers on behalf and for the benefit of the separate legal or administrative entity. Financing of joint projects by agreement shall be as provided by law. Acts 1967, ch. 350, § 4; 1973, ch. 88, § 3; 1973, ch. 355, § 3; T.C.A., § 12-804; Acts 1981, ch. 289, § 3; 1982, ch. 930, § 2; 1984, ch. 890, § 1; 1985, ch. 84, §§ 1-4; 1986, ch. 698, § 1; 1990, ch. 921, § 2; 1991, ch. 91, § 1; 1992, ch. 880, § 2; 1993, ch. 401, § 1; 2004, ch. 849, § 2. Cross-References. Mutual aid agreements, § 6-54-307 . Law Reviews. Eminent Domain — Moving Expense — A Condemnor in Tennessee Is Required to Pay Moving Expense for Fixtures and Chattels Upon Condemnation, 2 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 205. Attorney General Opinions. General sessions court judge acting as city court judge, OAG 09-0171, 1998 Tenn. AG LEXIS 171 (8/28/98). County authority to provide crushed stone to entities outside county, OAG 99-058, 1999 Tenn. AG LEXIS 41 (3/10/99). Several utility districts may establish a corporation as part of an interlocal cooperative agreement for a joint exercise of their powers; whether a district is authorized to support the activities in which the corporation will engage depends on whether its support is necessary or requisite to its authority to own, operate, develop, and maintain a utility district, OAG 03-017, 2003 Tenn. AG LEXIS 24 (2/19/03). Drug task forces are able to own real property in their own name as long as this is allowed by the particular interlocal agreement establishing the task force, OAG 05-038, 2003 Tenn. AG LEXIS 24 (3/29/05). Extent of municipal police authority beyond municipal limits. OAG 10-48, 2010 Tenn. AG LEXIS 48 (4/12/10). Interlocal agreements to provide cable services. OAG 12-15, 2012 Tenn. AG LEXIS 15 (2/15/12). City’s ability to contract with out-of-state water commission, OAG 14-65, 2014 Tenn. AG Lexis 66 (6/25/14) Authority of TWRA Officers to Enforce Local Noise Ordinances on Waters by Agreement with Local Law Enforcement Agency. OAG 15-68, 2015 Tenn. AG LEXIS 69 (9/23/15).