Ohio § 2307.98

§ 2307.98.

(A) A holder has no obligation to, and has no liability to, the covered entity or to

any person with respect to any obligation or liability of the covered entity in an

asbestos claim under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil unless the person

seeking to pierce the corporate veil demonstrates all of the following: (1) The holder exerted such control over the covered entity that the covered entity had

no separate mind, will, or existence of its own. (2) The holder caused the covered entity to be used for the purpose of perpetrating,

and the covered entity perpetrated, an actual fraud on the person seeking to pierce

the corporate veil primarily for the direct pecuniary benefit of the holder. (3) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil sustained an injury or unjust loss

as a direct result of the control described in division (A)(1) of this section and

the fraud described in division (A)(2) of this section. (B) A court shall not find that the holder exerted such control over the covered entity

that the covered entity did not have a separate mind, will, or existence of its own

or to have caused the covered entity to be used for the purpose of perpetrating a

fraud solely as a result of any of the following actions, events, or relationships: (1) The holder is an affiliate of the covered entity and provides legal, accounting,

treasury, cash management, human resources, administrative, or other similar services

to the covered entity, leases assets to the covered entity, or makes its employees

available to the covered entity. (2) The holder loans funds to the covered entity or guarantees the obligations of the

covered entity. (3) The officers and directors of the holder are also officers and directors of the covered

entity. (4) The covered entity makes payments of dividends or other distributions to the holder

or repays loans owed to the holder. (5) In the case of a covered entity that is a limited liability company, the holder or

its employees or agents serve as the manager of the covered entity. (C) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil has the burden of proof on each and

every element of the person's claim and must prove each element by a preponderance

of the evidence. (D) Any liability of the holder described in division (A) of this section for an obligation

or liability that is limited by that division is exclusive and preempts any other

obligation or liability imposed upon that holder for that obligation or liability

under common law or otherwise. (E) This section is intended to codify the elements of the common law cause of action

for piercing the corporate veil and to abrogate the common law cause of action and

remedies relating to piercing the corporate veil in asbestos claims.  Nothing in this section shall be construed as creating a right or cause of action

that did not exist under the common law as it existed on the effective date of this

section. (F) This section applies to all asbestos claims commenced on or after the effective date

of this section or commenced prior to and pending on the effective date of this section. (G) This section applies to all actions asserting the doctrine of piercing the corporate

veil brought against a holder if any of the following apply: (1) The holder is an individual and resides in this state. (2) The holder is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. (3) The holder is a corporation with its principal place of business in this state. (4) The holder is a foreign corporation that is authorized to conduct or has conducted

business in this state. (5) The holder is a foreign corporation whose parent corporation is authorized to conduct

business in this state. (6) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil is a resident of this state. (H) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) “ Affiliate ” and “ beneficial owner ” have the same meanings as in section 1704.01 of the Revised Code . (2) “ Asbestos ” has the same meaning as in section 2307.91 of the Revised Code . (3) “ Asbestos claim ” means any claim, wherever or whenever made, for damages, losses, indemnification,

contribution, or other relief arising out of, based on, or in any way related to asbestos.

“ Asbestos claim ” includes any of the following: (a) A claim made by or on behalf of any person who has been exposed to asbestos, or any

representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of that person, for injury,

including mental or emotional injury, death, or loss to person, risk of disease or

other injury, costs of medical monitoring or surveillance, or any other effects on

the person's health that are caused by the person's exposure to asbestos; (b) A claim for damage or loss to property that is caused by the installation, presence,

or removal of asbestos. (4) “ Corporation ” means a corporation for profit, including the following: (a) A domestic corporation that is organized under the laws of this state; (b) A foreign corporation that is organized under laws other than the laws of this state

and that has had a certificate of authority to transact business in this state or

has done business in this state. (5) “ Covered entity ” means a corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, or any other

entity organized under the laws of any jurisdiction, domestic or foreign, in which

the shareholders, owners, or members are generally not responsible for the debts and

obligations of the entity.  Nothing in this section limits or otherwise affects the liabilities imposed on a

general partner of a limited partnership. (6) “ Holder ” means a person who is the holder or beneficial owner of, or subscriber to, shares

or any other ownership interest of a covered entity, a member of a covered entity,

or an affiliate of any person who is the holder or beneficial owner of, or subscriber

to, shares or any other ownership interest of a covered entity. (7) “ Piercing the corporate veil ” means any and all common law doctrines by which a holder may be liable for an obligation

or liability of a covered entity on the basis that the holder controlled the covered

entity, the holder is or was the alter ego of the covered entity, or the covered entity

has been used for the purpose of actual or constructive fraud or as a sham to perpetrate

a fraud or any other common law doctrine by which the covered entity is disregarded

for purposes of imposing liability on a holder for the debts or obligations of that

covered entity. (8) “ Person ” has the same meaning as in section 1701.01 of the Revised Code .