New Jersey § 58:26-25

§ 58:26-25.

a. Within 60 days of receipt of the application, the board and division shall approve,

or conditionally approve, an application submitted by a public entity pursuant to

subsection f. of section 6 of P.L.1995, c. 101 ( C.58:26-24 ). Within 60 days of receipt of the hearing report, the department shall provide any

comments on the hearing report it deems appropriate to the board, division and public

entity. If the board or division fail to approve or conditionally approve the application

within 60 days after receipt, the application shall be deemed approved, unless the

public entity has agreed to an extension of the period. b. If either the board or division conditionally approves the application, the board

or division shall state in writing the revision to the proposed contract that is necessary

in order for it to be approved. If the board or division determines that the required revision is substantial, the

public entity shall hold a public hearing on the revision and adhere to the provisions

of section 6 of P.L.1995, c. 101 ( C.58:26-24 ) in so doing. A substantial revision shall be a change that results in an increase in the charges,

rates or fees of the private firm or that materially changes other terms and conditions

of the contract. The proposed revision to the contract shall be submitted to the board, division

and department 15 days prior to the date of the public hearing. If the board or division determines that the required revision in the conditional

approval is not substantial, the public entity shall submit the proposed revision

to the contract to the board and the division for approval and to the department for

review. The revision shall be approved if found to be consistent with the conditions set

forth in the conditional approval, or disapproved with a written explanation as to

why the revision is not consistent, within 15 days after the next public meeting of

the board or division. c. In its review of a contract, the board shall apply the following criteria in determining

whether to approve the contract: (1) The private firm entering into the contract has the financial capacity and technical

and administrative experience to ensure continuity of service over the term of the

contract and that the standards and requirements contained in the application documents

concerning the financial, technical and administrative capacity of the private firm

are necessary and sufficient to protect the public interest. (2) The terms of the contract are not unreasonable. In determining whether the terms of the contract are not unreasonable, the board

shall review the fees and charges to be charged or assessed under the contract to

determine that they are reasonable to the public entity, taking into consideration

all of the obligations undertaken by the private firm and all the benefits obtained

by the public entity. In making this determination, the board shall not use the traditional rate based

rate of return methodology. (3) The franchise customers of a public utility participating in a contract are protected

from the risks of the proposed contract and that they are not subsidizing the contract. If a private firm is not a public utility, the board shall ensure that under the

terms of the proposed contract the users of water outside of the jurisdiction or service

area that will receive water supply services under the contract are also protected

from the risks of the contract and that water users outside the jurisdiction or service

area are not subsidizing the contract through increased charges, rates or fees for

the supply of water. (4) The contract contains the provisions required by paragraphs (1), (2) and (6) of

subsection e. of section 5 of P.L.1995, c. 101 ( C.58:26-23 ). Upon approval of a contract as proposed or as revised in response to a conditional

approval, the jurisdiction of the board over the contract shall terminate until or

unless the contract is amended to change the formula or other basis of determining

charges contained therein. d. In its review of a contract, the division shall apply the following criteria in

determining whether to approve the contract: (1) The terms of the proposed contract do not materially impair the ability of the

public entity to punctually pay principal and interest due on its outstanding indebtedness

and to supply other essential public improvements and services. (2) A concession fee or other monetary benefit paid by a private firm as a result

of the contract is paid directly to the municipalities constituting that public entity,

if a public entity consisting of multiple municipalities has entered into a contract. Any concession fee or monetary benefit paid by a private firm to a public entity

is used for the purpose of reducing or off-setting property taxes. (3) The contract contains the provisions required by paragraphs (3), (4), (5), (7) , (8) , and (9) of subsection e. of section 5 of P.L.1995, c. 101 ( C.58:26-23 ). The division shall also review and specifically approve any contract provision pursuant

to which a public entity will or may execute a financing instrument for the purposes

set forth in the contract. e. The board or division may provide the public entity with any non-binding comments

or advice during or after the review of the application as the board or division deem

appropriate. f. The board or division shall assess and the applicant shall pay a fee equal to the

cost incurred by the board or division for an analysis of an application by an independent

person who has expertise in the area of water supply services if during the review

of an application the board or division determine that such an analysis is required

and a person with the required expertise is not readily available from within any

executive department of the State government. g. If the public entity and private firm would like to amend a contract after approval

of an application by the board and division, the public entity shall submit proposed

amendments to the board and division for approval and to the department for review. At the next public meeting of the board and of the division after receipt of proposed

amendments, the board and the division shall determine whether the proposed amendments

are substantial. If the amendments are substantial in nature as determined by either the board or

the division, the public entity shall conduct a hearing pursuant to section 6 of P.L.1995, c. 101 ( C.58:26-24 ). Within 60 days of the receipt of proposed amendments that are not determined to

be substantial, or within 60 days of the receipt of an application for approval of

proposed amendments that are determined to be substantial, the board and division

shall approve or conditionally approve the amendments in accordance with the applicable

procedures established for approval of an original contract pursuant to this section .