Nevada § 41A.100 - Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence
Full text of Nevada Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100 — Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence, with citation guidance and answers to common questions.
§ 41A.100. Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence
1. Liability for personal injury or death is not imposed upon any provider of health
care based on alleged negligence in the performance of that care unless evidence consisting
of expert medical testimony, material from recognized medical texts or treatises or
the regulations of the licensed medical facility wherein the alleged negligence occurred
is presented to demonstrate the alleged deviation from the accepted standard of care
in the specific circumstances of the case and to prove causation of the alleged personal
injury or death, except that such evidence is not required and a rebuttable presumption
that the personal injury or death was caused by negligence arises where evidence is
presented that the provider of health care caused the personal injury or death occurred
in any one or more of the following circumstances: (a) A foreign substance other than medication or a prosthetic device was unintentionally
left within the body of a patient following surgery; (b) An explosion or fire originating in a substance used in treatment occurred in
the course of treatment; (c) An unintended burn caused by heat, radiation or chemicals was suffered in the
course of medical care; (d) An injury was suffered during the course of treatment to a part of the body not
directly involved in the treatment or proximate thereto; or (e) A surgical procedure was performed on the wrong patient or the wrong organ, limb
or part of a patient's body. 2. Expert medical testimony provided pursuant to subsection 1 may only be given by
a provider of health care who practices or has practiced in an area that is substantially
similar to the type of practice engaged in at the time of the alleged negligence. 3. The rebuttable presumption pursuant to subsection 1 does not apply in an action
in which a plaintiff submits an affidavit pursuant to NRS 41A.071 , or otherwise designates an expert witness to establish that the specific provider
of health care deviated from the accepted standard of care. 4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude any party to the suit from
designating and presenting expert testimony as to the legal or proximate cause of
any alleged personal injury or death.
Source: official Nevada text · Last verified 2026-08-27
Frequently Asked Questions About Nevada § 41A.100
What does Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100 cover?
Section 41A.100 ("Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence") is part of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the codified statutory law of Nevada. It sets out the legal rule or procedure described in the text above. Statutes are amended regularly, so always verify against the official source.
How do I cite Nevada § 41A.100?
A common citation format is "Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100" (Nevada). Legal writing may require the code abbreviation, section number, and year or edition. Match the style required by your court, professor, or publisher.
Is this the official text of Nevada law?
No. This page is for research and education and may not include the most recent amendments. For official current law, check the Nevada official source linked on this page or consult a licensed Nevada attorney.
How does Nevada § 41A.100 apply to my situation?
Statutes are interpreted in context, and application depends on your specific facts. Only a licensed attorney in Nevada can advise on how this section applies to you. Contact your state or local bar association for a referral.
Sources & Verification
Not legal advice. Verify against the official source and consult a licensed attorney in Nevada.