Nevada § 41A.100 - Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence

Full text of Nevada Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100 — Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence, with citation guidance and answers to common questions.

§ 41A.100. Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence

1. Liability for personal injury or death is not imposed upon any provider of health

care based on alleged negligence in the performance of that care unless evidence consisting

of expert medical testimony, material from recognized medical texts or treatises or

the regulations of the licensed medical facility wherein the alleged negligence occurred

is presented to demonstrate the alleged deviation from the accepted standard of care

in the specific circumstances of the case and to prove causation of the alleged personal

injury or death, except that such evidence is not required and a rebuttable presumption

that the personal injury or death was caused by negligence arises where evidence is

presented that the provider of health care caused the personal injury or death occurred

in any one or more of the following circumstances: (a) A foreign substance other than medication or a prosthetic device was unintentionally

left within the body of a patient following surgery; (b) An explosion or fire originating in a substance used in treatment occurred in

the course of treatment; (c) An unintended burn caused by heat, radiation or chemicals was suffered in the

course of medical care; (d) An injury was suffered during the course of treatment to a part of the body not

directly involved in the treatment or proximate thereto; or (e) A surgical procedure was performed on the wrong patient or the wrong organ, limb

or part of a patient's body. 2. Expert medical testimony provided pursuant to subsection 1 may only be given by

a provider of health care who practices or has practiced in an area that is substantially

similar to the type of practice engaged in at the time of the alleged negligence. 3. The rebuttable presumption pursuant to subsection 1 does not apply in an action

in which a plaintiff submits an affidavit pursuant to NRS 41A.071 , or otherwise designates an expert witness to establish that the specific provider

of health care deviated from the accepted standard of care. 4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude any party to the suit from

designating and presenting expert testimony as to the legal or proximate cause of

any alleged personal injury or death.

Source: official Nevada text · Last verified 2026-08-27

Frequently Asked Questions About Nevada § 41A.100

What does Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100 cover?

Section 41A.100 ("Required evidence; exceptions; rebuttable presumption of negligence") is part of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the codified statutory law of Nevada. It sets out the legal rule or procedure described in the text above. Statutes are amended regularly, so always verify against the official source.

How do I cite Nevada § 41A.100?

A common citation format is "Nevada Revised Statutes § 41A.100" (Nevada). Legal writing may require the code abbreviation, section number, and year or edition. Match the style required by your court, professor, or publisher.

Is this the official text of Nevada law?

No. This page is for research and education and may not include the most recent amendments. For official current law, check the Nevada official source linked on this page or consult a licensed Nevada attorney.

How does Nevada § 41A.100 apply to my situation?

Statutes are interpreted in context, and application depends on your specific facts. Only a licensed attorney in Nevada can advise on how this section applies to you. Contact your state or local bar association for a referral.

Sources & Verification

Not legal advice. Verify against the official source and consult a licensed attorney in Nevada.