Nevada § 130.316 - Special rules of evidence and procedure

§ 130.316. Special rules of evidence and procedure

1. The physical presence of a nonresident party who is a natural person in a tribunal

of this State is not required for the establishment, enforcement or modification of

a support order or the rendition of a judgment determining parentage of a child. 2. An affidavit, a document substantially complying with federally mandated forms

or a document incorporated by reference in any of them, which would not be excluded

under the hearsay rule in NRS 51.065 if given in person, is admissible in evidence if given under penalty of perjury by

a party or witness residing outside this State. 3. A copy of the record of child-support payments certified as a true copy of the

original by the custodian of the record may be forwarded to a responding tribunal. The copy is evidence of facts asserted therein and is admissible to show whether

payments were made. 4. Copies of bills for testing for parentage of a child, and for prenatal and postnatal

health care of the mother and child, furnished to the adverse party at least 20 days

before trial are admissible in evidence to prove the amount of the charges billed

and that the charges were reasonable, necessary and customary. 5. Documentary evidence transmitted from outside this State to a tribunal of this

State by telephone, telecopier or other electronic means that do not provide an original

record may not be excluded from evidence on an objection based on the means of transmission. 6. In a proceeding under this chapter, a tribunal of this State shall permit a party

or witness residing outside this State to be deposed or to testify under penalty of

perjury by telephone, audiovisual means or other electronic means at a designated

tribunal or other location. A tribunal of this State shall cooperate with other tribunals in designating an

appropriate location for the deposition or testimony. 7. In a civil proceeding under this chapter, if a party called to testify refuses

to answer a question on the ground that the testimony may be self-incriminating, the

trier of fact may draw an adverse inference from the refusal. 8. A privilege against the disclosure of communications between a married couple does

not apply in a proceeding under this chapter. 9. The defense of immunity based on the relationship of a married couple or parent

and child does not apply in a proceeding under this chapter. 10. A voluntary acknowledgment of paternity developed by the State Board of Health

pursuant to NRS 440.283 or a voluntary acknowledgment of parentage developed by the State Board of Health

pursuant to NRS 440.285 , certified as a true copy, is admissible to establish parentage of the child.