Idaho § 67-9418

§ 67-9418.

reporting requirements. (1) For the purposes of this section:

(a) "Agency" means a state agency that is subject to the provisions of section 67-1904 , Idaho Code, and that is a licensing authority as defined in this chapter.

(b) "Credible complaint" means an allegation supported by specific facts or evidence that reasonably warrants investigation of a potential quality-related violation or technical violation.

(c) "Quality-related violation" means a disciplinary action that relates to direct consumer harm such as an injury from a practice error or negligence.

(d) "Technical violation" means a disciplinary action that relates to the violation of a specific occupational licensing-related law or rule that does not cause direct consumer harm, such as failing to meet a continuing education requirement, late renewal of a license, or failing to hold certain required insurance.

(2) As part of the annual performance report that an agency is required to prepare pursuant to section 67-1904 , Idaho Code, an agency shall, beginning with the fiscal year 2027 report, include the following information separately for each license under its purview:

(a) The total number of licensees as of the last day of the fiscal year;

(b) The total number of new licenses issued during the fiscal year;

(c) The number of new applicants for licensure who were denied licensure during the fiscal year;

(d) The number of licenses renewed during the fiscal year;

(e) The number of licenses that were not renewed during the fiscal year;

(f) The number of credible complaints against licensees during the fiscal year; and

(g) The number of final disciplinary actions against licensees during the fiscal year.

(3) For disciplinary actions reported pursuant to subsection (2)(g) of this section, an agency shall report:

(a) The number and type of disciplinary action taken, reported as a corrective action plan, civil fine, license suspension, license revocation, or other;

(b) The number of related disciplinary actions stemming from technical violations;

(c) The number of related disciplinary actions stemming from quality-related violations; and

(d) For all quality-related violations, a brief, de-identified summary of the violations suitable for the lay public to understand the nature of the case.