Hawaii § 386-73 - Original jurisdiction over controversies.

Full text of Hawaii Hawaii Revised Statutes § 386-73 — Original jurisdiction over controversies., with citation guidance and answers to common questions.

§ 386-73. Original jurisdiction over controversies.

Unless otherwise provided, the director of labor and industrial relations shall have original jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising under this chapter. The decisions of the director shall be enforceable by the circuit court as provided in section 386-91. There shall be a right of appeal from the decisions of the director to the appellate board and thence to the intermediate appellate court, subject to chapter 602, as provided in sections 386-87 and 386-88, but in no case shall an appeal operate as a supersedeas or stay unless the appellate board or the appellate court so orders. [L 1963, c 116, pt of §1; Supp, §97-72; HRS §386-73; am L 1969, c 244, §2b; am L 1979, c 111, §18; am L 2004, c 202, §42; am L 2006, c 94, §1; am L 2010, c 109, §1] Cross References Appeal, see chapter 91. Rules of Court Appeal to supreme court, stay, see Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure. Case Notes This section and §386-88 supersede §91-14 and remove the circuit court from the appellate process with regard to proceedings brought under chapter 386. 53 H. 640, 500 P.2d 746 (1972). "Independent system of legal relations" in this chapter debars declaratory relief under chapter 632. 64 H. 380, 641 P.2d 1333 (1982). Section does not deprive circuit court of subject matter jurisdiction over common law tort claims not based on the original work injury. 83 H. 457, 927 P.2d 858 (1996). Where claimant's common law tort claims against employer's insurer did not arise under this chapter, director did not have original jurisdiction under this section. 83 H. 457, 927 P.2d 858 (1996). Where claimant's complaint raised a "controversy or dispute under this chapter" over which the director had original jurisdiction, summary judgment properly granted by circuit court as court was without jurisdiction over claim. 83 H. 457, 927 P.2d 858 (1996). A settlement or compromise of future workers' compensation benefits constitutes a controversy or dispute within the original jurisdiction of the director of labor and industrial relations under this section. 90 H. 152, 977 P.2d 160 (1999). Under §386-8, this section, and Hawaii administrative rule §12-10-31, a settlement or compromise of future workers' compensation benefits cannot be valid or binding without the consent or approval of the director of labor and industrial relations. 90 H. 152, 977 P.2d 160 (1999). Where plaintiff's claims did not arise under this chapter, the exclusive remedy and original jurisdiction provisions in the workers' compensation statute did not apply, and where plaintiff's claims for relief of tortious conduct on the part of workers' compensation insurer were not within the original jurisdiction of the labor director, trial court erred in granting summary judgment on that basis. 90 H. 407, 978 P.2d 845 (1999). This section and §386-87 set forth the right to appeal from the decisions of the director in workers' compensation cases and it gives a party the right to appeal the decision of the director in a medical fee dispute to the labor and industrial relations appeals board; thus, the no-appeal provision of Hawaii administrative rule §12-15-94(d) was invalid as inconsistent with this chapter, and the director exceeded the director's rulemaking authority in making the director's decisions in medical fee disputes final and non-appealable. 120 H. 101 (App.), 201 P.3d 614 (2009). Where employee appealed the director of labor and industrial relations' (director) decision, which deferred determination of compensability on employee's workers' compensation claim until employee complied with the ordered independent medical examination, the labor and industrial relations appeals board (LIRAB) was required to exercise jurisdiction over the appeal because the LIRAB's failure to review the director's decision until entry of a final decision on employee's entitlement to benefits would deprive employee of adequate relief. 134 H. 99 (App.), 332 P.3d 701 (2014). Cited: 24 H. 731, 736 (1919). Previous Vol07_Ch0346-0398 Next

Source: official Hawaii text · Last verified 2026-08-27

Frequently Asked Questions About Hawaii § 386-73

What does Hawaii Revised Statutes § 386-73 cover?

Section 386-73 ("Original jurisdiction over controversies.") is part of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, the codified statutory law of Hawaii. It sets out the legal rule or procedure described in the text above. Statutes are amended regularly, so always verify against the official source.

How do I cite Hawaii § 386-73?

A common citation format is "Hawaii Revised Statutes § 386-73" (Hawaii). Legal writing may require the code abbreviation, section number, and year or edition. Match the style required by your court, professor, or publisher.

Is this the official text of Hawaii law?

No. This page is for research and education and may not include the most recent amendments. For official current law, check the Hawaii official source linked on this page or consult a licensed Hawaii attorney.

How does Hawaii § 386-73 apply to my situation?

Statutes are interpreted in context, and application depends on your specific facts. Only a licensed attorney in Hawaii can advise on how this section applies to you. Contact your state or local bar association for a referral.

Sources & Verification

Not legal advice. Verify against the official source and consult a licensed attorney in Hawaii.