Colorado § 15-1-305 - Terms of instrument govern.

§ 15-1-305. Terms of instrument govern.

Nothing in this part 3 shall be construed as authorizing any departure from or variation of the express terms or limitations set forth in any will, agreement, court order, or other instrument creating or defining the fiduciary's duties and powers, but the terms "legal investment" or "authorized investment", or words of similar import as used in any such instrument, shall be taken to mean any investment which is permitted by the terms of section 15-1-304.

Source: L. 51: p. 840, § 2. CSA: C. 176, § 126(6). CRS 53: § 57-3-2. C.R.S. 1963: § 57-3-2.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "The Meaning of the Prudent Man Rule", see 24 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 44 (1951). For comment on Rippey v. Denver United States Nat'l Bank, appearing below, see 45 Den. L.J. 483 (1968).

Despite will's provisions, trustee does not have absolute discretion. In the will the trustee is authorized to sell the trust property (1) in its sole judgment; (2) at private sale; (3) without advertisement or notice to anyone; (4) without the aid or necessity of any court order; (5) without consulting the beneficiaries and without regard to their opinions, desires, or judgment; (6) and at such price and upon such terms as to credit or otherwise as the trustee shall determine. The trustee is not therefore authorized to exercise unlimited or absolute discretion in making a sale of trust property. Rippey v. Denver United States Nat'l Bank, 273 F. Supp. 718 (D. Colo. 1967).

In any event trustee cannot act recklessly. Even if the instrument had contained language granting absolute and uncontrolled discretion, it would not follow that the trustee could act recklessly or in willful abuse of discretion. Rippey v. Denver United States Nat'l Bank, 273 F. Supp. 718 (D. Colo. 1967).

When the bank acts despite a high probability that the beneficiaries would suffer loss, such conduct is in law reckless and is not protected by an exculpatory clause. Rippey v. Denver United States Nat'l Bank, 273 F. Supp. 718 (D. Colo. 1967).

Exculpatory clause does not apply to transaction conducted in unorthodox manner. An exculpatory clause in the will which provides that the trustee shall be free from liability for "depreciation or loss" of trust property "through error of judgment" does not apply to a loss which resulted from a sale which was not conducted in accordance with orthodox trust principles. Such a provision is usually held to add nothing. It does not limit the trustee liability for even negligence. If the exculpatory provision in express terms relieves the trustee from liability merely for errors of judgment, its effect does not go beyond what a court of equity would do in the absence of an exculpatory provision for a trustee is never held to the liability of an insurer. Rippey v. Denver United States Nat'l Bank, 273 F. Supp. 718 (D. Colo. 1967).